Bridging the Gap Report: Palestinian Hopes for Barack Obama
AFP file picture shows a painting of USA President-elect Barack Hussein Obama II,
found in the streets of the city of Ramallah, occupied Palestine.
By Yasser Abed Rabbo, 12/01/2008 President-elect Barack Obama’s defiantly
positive campaign for change has inspired hope not only in the millions of
Americans who voted for him, but also in the billions of others worldwide who
could not. Across the Middle East, as elsewhere, expectations are building that
his presidency will herald a new era for America’s role in the world.
Palestinians identify strongly with the civil rights movement in the United
States. Many recall the dark days when American society enforced racial
segregation. That the same society elected an African-American president only a
few decades later renews Palestinian hopes that, in our ongoing struggle for
justice and freedom, we, too, shall overcome.
Obama’s electoral triumph arrives at a symbolic moment in Palestinian history.
This month marks the twentieth anniversary of the Palestinian Declaration of
Independence. Drafted by the poetic hand of my late friend, Mahmoud Darwish, the
text is nothing short of visionary. Whereas previously the Palestine Liberation
Organization (PLO) had campaigned for a single, secular, and democratic state
across the entirety of mandatory Palestine, our Declaration of Independence
endorsed a two-state solution.
The depth of this compromise can be fully appreciated only in its historical
context. In the war and violence that surrounded Israel’s establishment in 1948,
our losses were immense. Over 726,000 Palestinian Christians and Muslims – the
majority of the Arab population of mandatory Palestine – fled or were forced to
leave their homes by Zionist militias. Over 400 Palestinian villages in what
became Israel were destroyed or depopulated.
Endorsing a two-state solution meant recognizing Israeli sovereignty over 78% of
our homeland and exercising our right to self-determination on only the
remaining 22% that Israel has occupied militarily since 1967: the West Bank,
including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip. Yet we made this historic
compromise because we believed that doing so would bring us to the threshold of
Of course, that is not how things have turned out: Palestinians have been living
under Israeli occupation for 41 years. As Obama prepares to enter the White
House, we are confident that he will consider the constructive role America can
play in the search for peace and security.
In the year since Palestinians and Israelis renewed their commitment to their
obligations under the “road map,” we may have failed to reach a conclusive
settlement to our conflict, but that does not mean that the efforts made were in
vain. With the determination of both sides, I am confident that we can reach a
final agreement in relatively short order.
The US can take four practical steps to help negotiations move forward
immediately. The first step is early engagement. The Bush administration’s
efforts to assist our peace-making project faltered in part because our conflict
was neglected during the early part of its tenure. Allowing this conflict to
fester will only aggravate our peoples’ insecurity and our region’s instability.
Second, the US should establish a credible enforcement mechanism to ensure that
the parties comply with their respective obligations, particularly an immediate
freeze on Israeli settlement activity throughout the occupied Palestinian
territory. Not only has Israel failed to halt its settlement activity since
Annapolis – in violation of international law and its renewed road map
commitments – but it has actually accelerated such activity.
Construction of settlement housing units is over 45% higher now than in the nine
months prior to Annapolis. Israeli demolitions of Palestinian homes have also
increased, particularly in occupied East Jerusalem. Nothing undermines
Palestinian faith in the peace process like watching the homes of our families
flattened, while the architecture of our oppression is strengthened.
Third, the new administration should encourage the re-engagement of its Quartet
partners – the United Nations, the European Union, and Russia – in the mediation
process. International cooperation is key to securing the legitimacy of
negotiations, and it will be critical when the time comes for the enforcement
and implementation of any agreement. The US cannot be expected to shoulder the
post-conflict burdens of peacekeeping alone.
Fourth, the US should renew its respect for international law by recognizing
three principles: that the 1967 pre-occupation boundaries must be respected in
any negotiations; that Palestinian sovereignty over East Jerusalem must be
safeguarded, with guaranteed access for Muslims, Christians, and Jews to their
holy sites; and that the plight of Palestinian refugees, whose 60-year ordeal
remains emblematic of the Palestinian predicament, must be acknowledged and
Fortunately, a framework already exists that supports these concerns. The 2002
Arab Peace Initiative offers Israel a unique opportunity: full normalization of
relations with 57 Arab and Muslim states in return for a comprehensive peace
agreement, including an end to Israel’s occupation of Arab lands and a just and
agreed upon solution for refugees.
Our Declaration of Independence is now twenty years old. The Arab Peace
Initiative has been collecting dust for over six years. Palestinian patience is
not infinite. Some have already resigned themselves to believing a viable
Palestinian state will never emerge. Others, like me, argue that we must not
lose faith. But if we are to realize our dream of freedom and statehood -and
prove the cynics wrong- we will need President Obama’s help.
Yasser Abed Rabbo is Secretary General of the Executive Committee of the
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Copyright:
The Brazilian Palestinian National Interest Committee is a non-profit
organization whose principal mission is to work with the legislative body of
Brazil on legislation that strengthens the relationship between Brazil and